Harrison says U.S.
Supreme Court
got it wrong on marriage ruling
God is our refuge and strength,
a very present help in trouble.
Therefore we will not fear though the earth gives way,
though the mountains be moved into the heart of
the sea,
though its waters roar and foam,
though the mountains tremble at its swelling.
Selah
There is a river whose streams make glad the city of
God,
the holy habitation of the Most High.
God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved;
God will help her when morning dawns.
The nations rage, the kingdoms totter;
he utters his voice, the earth melts.
The LORD of hosts is with us;
the God of Jacob is our fortress (Psalm 46:1–7).
A one-person majority of the
U.S. Supreme Court got it wrong – again. Some 40 years ago, a similarly
activist court legalized the killing of children in the womb. That decision has
to date left a wake of some 55 million Americans dead. Today, the Court has
imposed same-sex marriage upon the whole nation in a similar fashion. Five
justices cannot determine natural or divine law. Now shall come the time of
testing for Christians faithful to the Scriptures and the divine institution of
marriage (Matthew 19:3–6), and indeed, a time of testing much more intense than
what followed Roe v. Wade.
Like Roe v. Wade
, this decision will be followed by a rash of lawsuits. Through coercive
litigation, governments and popular culture continue to make the central
post-modern value of sexual freedom override “the free exercise of religion”
enshrined in the Bill of Rights.
The ramifications of this
decision are seismic. Proponents will seek to drive Christians and Christian
institutions out of education at all levels; they will press laws to force
faithful Christian institutions and individuals to violate consciences in work
practices and myriad other ways. We will have much more to say about this.
During some of the darkest days of Germany, a faithful Lutheran presciently
described how governments lose their claim to legitimate authority according to
Romans 13.
The Caesar cult in its manifold forms, the deification of the state, is one
great form of the defection from the [true] idea of the state. There are also
other possibilities of such defection. The government can forget and neglect
its tasks. When it no longer distinguishes between right and wrong, when its
courts are no longer governed by the strict desire for justice, but by special
interests, when government no longer has the courage to exercise its law, fails
to exercise its duties, undermines its own legal order, when it weakens through
its family law parental authority and the estate of marriage, then it ceases to
be governing authority.
Raising such a question can lead
to heavy conflicts of conscience. But it is fundamentally conceivable, and it
has time and again become reality in history, that a governing authority has
ceased to be governing authority. In such a case there may indeed exist a
submission to a superior power. But the duty of obedience against this power no
longer exists. [Hermann Sasse, “What Is the
State?”(1932)]
As
faithful Christians, we shall continue to be obedient to just laws. We affirm
the human rights of all individuals and the inherent and equal value of all
people. We respect the divinely given dignity of all people, no matter their
sexual preference. We recognize that, under the exacting and demanding laws of
God, we are indeed sinners in thought, word and deed, just as are all (Romans
3:9ff.). We confess that the “blood of Jesus Christ, God’s Son, cleanses us
from all our sins” (1 John 1:7). We confess that God’s divine law of marriage
and the entire Ten Commandments apply to all, and that so also the life-giving
sacrifice of Christ on the cross is for all. It is a “righteousness of God
through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe” (Romans 3:22).
However, even as we struggle as
a church to come to a unified response to this blatant rejection of the entire
history of humankind and its practice of marriage, “We shall obey God rather
than man” (Acts 5:29). Christians will now begin to learn what it means to be
in a state of solemn conscientious objection against the state. We will resist
its imposition of falsehood upon us, even as we continue to reach out to those
who continue to be harmed by the ethic of radical sexual freedom, detached from
God’s blessing of marriage. And we will stand shoulder to shoulder with
Christians, churches and people of good will who are resolute on this issue.
God help us. Amen.
Pastor Matthew C. Harrison